Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Crumpton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 2016No. 14-1344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*757Thomas A. Stokes, III ("Plaintiff") appeals from an order denying Plaintiff's motions seeking post-award discovery in an action resolved by voluntary arbitration under the Family Law Arbitration Act. We dismiss Plaintiff's appeal because Plaintiff has not demonstrated that this interlocutory order deprives him of a substantial right which will be jeopardized without review prior to a final determination on the merits of his motion to vacate the arbitration award and set aside *539the trial court's order confirming the arbitration award. *758I. Background

Plaintiff and Catherine C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Dworsky v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Bluffs, Inc. v. WysockiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Bullard v. TALL HOUSE BLDG. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stokes v. CrumptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API