Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Crumpton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 2017No. 168A16PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Justice.

This case is about whether a trial court has discretion to order post-confirmation discovery in an action under the Family Law Arbitration Act and a party’s right to an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s denial of such a motion. We hold that plaintiff had a right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to engage in discovery and that the trial court has discretion to order post-confirmation discovery in this case. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case with instructions for the Court of Appeals to vacate the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. MCI CONSTRUCTORS, LLC v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. Dworsky v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Bluffs, Inc. v. WysockiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feeassco, LLC v. Steel Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Reynolds v. Devotion Fam., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API