Cox v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion.
FACTS
In April 1989, plaintiff entered into a six-month contract with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to provide his expertise in public finance matters to an undercover investigation of various Indiana public officials. Plaintiff rendered the contracted-for services and was paid. In October 1989, plaintiff and the FBI entered into a second six-month contract for the same…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Overall Roofing & Construction Inc., A/K/A Overall Roofing, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Overall Roofing & Construction Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sitco General Trading & Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009