Legal Opinion
Sitco General Trading & Contracting Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 22, 2009No. 08-603CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
The United States Army contracted with plaintiff for construction of concrete barriers on-site at Camp Taji, Iraq. At the conclusion of the contract, the Army ordered the deconstruction of SITCO’s temporary concrete factory. Plaintiff alleges that the Army denied SITCO’s representative access to the base during the deconstruction, causing plaintiff $31 million in damages. The Government moved to dismiss SITCO’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Because plaintiff did not exhaust its administrative remedies before coming to court, we rule for defendant.
*508BACKGROUND
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy v. The Swanson Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Kingston Environmental Services, Inc., United States for the use and benefit of v. David Boland, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- Lodge Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021