People v. Bailey
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Could of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders denying a motion for a new trial and a motion in arrest of judgment. Carroll Cook, Judge.- The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The defendant was charged with the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed by willfully, feloniously, etc., having sexual intercourse with a female child under the age of sixteen years, and was found “guilty as charged in the information.” He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Among the points made by appellant for a reversal there is really only one which calls for special notice, and it arises out of that part of the charge of the court to the jury which deals with the form of their verdict and the offenses of which he might be convicted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. McNuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. RothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.