Legal Opinion

State v. Strieff

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2015No. 20120854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

{1 In this case we are asked to determine the applicability of the "attenuation" exception to the exclusionary rule to a fact pattern addressed in a broad range of lower-court opinions but not by the United States Supreme Court. The essential fact pattern involves an unlawful detention leading to the discovery of an arrest warrant followed by a search incident to arrest. The attenuation inquiry is essentially a proximate cause analysis. -It asks whether the fruit of the search is tainted by the initial, unlawful detention, or whether the taint is dissipated by…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. State v. Rowan, GeorgeUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Brierley v. Layton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API