Legal Opinion

Utah v. Strieff

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 2016No. 14–1373PublishedCited by 313 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

To enforce the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against "unreasonable searches and seizures," this Court has at times required courts to exclude evidence obtained by unconstitutional police conduct. But the Court has also held that, even when there is a Fourth Amendment violation, this exclusionary rule does not apply when the costs of exclusion outweigh its deterrent benefits. In some cases, for example, the link between the unconstitutional conduct and the discovery of the evidence is too attenuated to justify suppression. The question in this case is whether this attenuation doctrine applies…

Also in this document: Dissent · Sotomayor; Dissent · Kagan.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by313 opinions

  1. United States v. Noe Raygoza-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Dancy v. McGinleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. John Hall v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State of Tennessee v. James HawkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2017

308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API