Legal Opinion

Brierley v. Layton City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2016No. Case No. 20150760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Certiorari to the Court of Appeals

Justice Pearce,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 Two Layton City police officers investigating a hit-and-run accident entered a private residence with neither permission nor a warrant. While there, they discovered evidence linking Chelse Marie Brierley to the accident. Brierley moved to suppress that evidence, arguing Layton City (City) had obtained it in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. The City argued that the officers were in the process of obtaining a search warrant at the time they entered the house and that the evidence should therefore be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MetUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. AbonzaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
  3. State v. AndrusUtah Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API