Legal Opinion

Deringer, Admr. v. Conner.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1959No. 276Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcClintock, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Holmes County. We will refer to the parties as they were designated in the court below, to wit, Walter L. Deringer, administrator, as plaintiff, and Denver Roy Conner, as defendant.

Plaintiff filed an amended petition, as administrator of the estate of Denver Leroy Deringer, deceased, and for his cause of action against the defendant, Denver Roy Conner, says that he is the duly appointed, qualified and acting administrator of the estate of Denver Leroy Deringer, deceased, and that the defendant is a resident…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Morrow v. Hume, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Helleren v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Akers v. StirnOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kitchens v. DuffieldOhio Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API