Legal Opinion
Baybrook v. Chater
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 14, 1996No. 94 CV 282PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Robert Baybrook (“Baybrook”) brought an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Services (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. (“the Act”). United States Magistrate Judge Jerome Niedermeier affirmed the Commissioner’s decision. On November 20, 1995, Baybrook appealed the Magistrate’s order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(4). On appeal, Baybrook argues that the Administrative Law Judge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Johnson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hughes v. ApfelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Reynard v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2016
- Abbott Radiology Associates v. ShalalaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Caserto v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Teta v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004