Legal Opinion
Teta v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 27, 2004No. 2:02-cv-06414Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Joseph Teta (“Teta” or the “plaintiff’) commenced this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying disability benefits to him. Both parties move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”).
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On May 28, 1999 Teta filed an application for social security disability insurance benefits, alleging an inability to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ermano Valente v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.