Legal Opinion
United States v. Dantana Tanksley
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2017No. 15-11078 Conference CalendarPublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
In light of Mathis v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016), and United States v. Hinkle, 832 F.3d 569 (5th Cir. 2016), we granted defendant Dantana Tanksley’s motion for panel rehearing to decide whether United States v. Ford, 509 F.3d 714 (5th Cir. 2007), still represents the law. Ford held that a conviction for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance under section 481.112(a) of the Texas Health and Safety Code (“Section 481.112(a)”) qualifies as a “controlled substance offense” under the United States Sentencing Commission…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- United States v. Guadalupe AlcantarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Wayland HinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ibarra-LunaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- United States v. Michael HegwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Bonvillian Marine Service v. PellegrinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Osman ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Dantana TanksleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.