Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Herrold

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2018No. 14-11317PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Three decades ago, Congress set the courts upon a new course for the sentencing of federal defendants, moving away from a long-in-place system that gave wide discretion to federal judges to impose sentences from nigh no prison time to effective life sentences.

But this discretion was not so wide in practice as in appearance-the judge's sentence gave way when the prisoner left the court for prison. The total time served by the prisoner was on his arrival determined in the main by a parole commission. The commission determined release dates, and in a rough…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. Maurice DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Jerry Van Cannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Eddie Wiese, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Roberto Moreno PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API