United States v. Ibarra-Luna
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
In United States v. Morales-Sanchez, we held that a district court must always “correctly calculate] the applicable Guidelines range” before imposing a sentence. 1 Today we address whether a sentence may be upheld if an error in the calculation is shown to be harmless. We hold that under the discretionary sentenc ing regime of Booker and progeny, 2 the harmless error doctrine applies only if the proponent of the sentence convincingly demonstrates both (1) that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had it not made the error, and (2) that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- United States v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Dantana TanksleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Matthew SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Brian RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Howard HalversonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.