Paul Martin Co. v. Sumpter
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Appellant sued appellee for an alleged unpaid balance arising out of a series of transactions whereby appellant delivered certain articles of women’s clothing to ap-pellee. Appellant claimed the transactions were sales. Appellee alleged that the goods were delivered on “consignment” and were ■to be paid for only, when resold by her at retail. An offer to return the unsold goods was made prior to trial, but such offer was rejected by appellant. The trial court held for appellee on the ground that appellant had not proved sales by the preponderance of the evidence; this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Holt v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Tatum v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- United States v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1938
- In Re United States Electrical Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Powers Gallery, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Foster v. Pace Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956