Legal Opinion

State v. Tiedeman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1926No. File No. 5700PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

In December, 1923, defendant was convicted of the crime of adultery in the circuit court of Corson county. From a judgment and order denying a new trial, he appeals.

The 8 assignments of error present but 4 questions for this court: (1) Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict? (2) Was the verdict contrary to the law and the evidence. (3)! Did the court err in refusing to permit the complaining witness to answer a question put to him on his cross-examination? (4) Did the court err in permitting one of the jurors to be excused while they were considering of their verdict; and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oborn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State v. FrisbeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Dickinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
  4. State v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sweeney v. HewettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Zellers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Re KortgaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. ThwingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API