Legal Opinion

Re Kortgaard

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1936No. File No. Cr. 134PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner in July 1935 was on trial in the district court charged with the commission of a felony. One of the jurors became seriously ill with a stroke of paralysis and it was necessary to excuse this juror. The trial judge in open court in the presence of the state's attorney, the defendant, and the defendant's attorneys stated the condition of the juror, and the state's attorney, the attorneys for the defendant, and the defendant himself stated there was no objection to his discharge. After some further discussion all of the parties…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. American Publishing Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Oborn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion to the SenateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. State v. KranzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Munsell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. State v. MathisenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kirk v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API