Legal Opinion

Hanks v. Hamman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1926No. 1359. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.

The following statement of the nature and result of the suit is taken from appellant’s brief:

“This was an action of trespass to try title brought by Wyatt Hanks, a person of unsound mind, through his next friend, H. E. Marshall, ag-ainst the appellees, George Hamman, J. P. Scranton, and Harry C. Hanzen. By the first amended original petition it was shown that H. E. Marshall had been appointed guardian of the estate of Wyatt Hanks, and he appeared in that capacity from that time on. In addition to the formal action of trespass to try title, plaintiff specially asked for the cancellation of a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Curdy v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Arambula v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanks v. HammanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Hanks v. HammanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API