Hanks v. Hamman

This case is fully stated by the Court of Civil Appeals. See 282 S. W. 935. It is unnecessary to do more here than set out the facts bearing upon the one controlling issue in the case. We agree that this issue is correctly stated by the Court of Civil Appeals as follows:

“If the description of the land in the probate proceedings and guardian’s sale was sufficient, then title to the land is in appellees, but otherwise appellant would be entitled to recovery. This is* the controlling question in the case.”

The Court of Civil Appeals decided that the description in the probate proceedings, aided…