People v. Herbst
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (P. D.), Acting P. J.
I
Randall Herbst, David Brian Andreas, and Timothy Stephens were convicted of cultivating marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358) and possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359). The court stayed imposition of sentence and granted three years’ probation to appellants on condition they each serve 270 days in county jail.
Facts
As a result of random aerial surveillance by the Tulare County Sheriff’s office, three suspected marijuana gardens were located on the 193-acre Thompson parcel, along Balch Park Road. Officers obtained a warrant to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.