People v. Azure
California Court of Appeal
1DissentEvans, Acting P. J.
I dissent.
I have independently listened to the four-hour tape recording, which resulted in some incriminating admissions by the defendant, to determine whether those admissions were voluntarily made. (People v. Jimenez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 609 [147 Cal.Rptr. 172, 580 P.2d 672].) I conclude as did the trial judge that the four-hour interview was not a coercive interrogation but rather a dialogue between defendant and Officer Virgil Lowe of the Stockton Police Department in which Officer Lowe skillfully interrogated and commented on the realities of the molestation allegations made against the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.