Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Goodman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

Error proceedings are prosecuted from the decision of the common pleas court, wherein the defendant in error, Sam Goodman, a minor, after a trial by jury, recovered a judgment against plaintiff in error.

It appears from the record that on June 3, 1922, defendant in error Eli A. Tischman purchased an automobile on the installment plan and gave a mortgage for the unpaid balance of the purchase price; that, on the same date, Tischman, the mortgagor, arranged as to the issuance of a fire and theft policy of insurance in his favor to protect the mortgagee as to the payment of the balance secured by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gohman v. City of St. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Seitz v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Goodman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Clements v. Ohio State Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Green v. ShepherdOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Trent v. DeMangeOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API