Roberd v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DICE, Commissioner.
The conviction is for sodomy; the punishment, two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The indictment alleged that the offense was committed on or about- the ,13th day of May, -1954.
Evidence that appellant .committed the offense is shown by the testimony of the prosecuting witness, Bobby iNewland. The court in its charge instructed the jury that the witness, Newland,- was an accomplice as a matter of law and therefore his testi•mony must be corroborated to sustain this conviction.
The witness, Newland, who was seventeen years of age, testified that he became acquainted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Almazan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Masten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Masten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by13 opinions
- Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Cherb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Etheredge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Odom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Ayala v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.