Legal Opinion

Almazan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1940No. 21180PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense for which appellant was convicted was as an accomplice to burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of four years.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to corroborate Louis Loncario, the self-confessed burglar, to justify and sustain the conviction.

Loncario testified that he met appellant for the first time at a domino parlor on the corner of Medina and Commerce Streets in the City of San Antonio, Texas, about one and one-half years prior to the commission of the alleged offense; that appellant asked him at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. McInnis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Roberd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  4. Roberd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API