Legal Opinion

Masten v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1928No. 11295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.

The offense is incest; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

Appellant calls in question the sufficiency of the evidence, asserting that the testimony of Laura Belle Henard, who was an accomplice, is not sufficiently corroborated.

The testimony of prosecutrix was, in substance, as follows: Prosecutrix, Laura Belle Henard, was appellant’s niece. In the spring of 1922 she lived at Era, in Cook county. She had gone to school during the winter and until the latter part of April when school closed. School closed on Friday, and on the following Wednesday or Thursday…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Roberd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Gonzales, Pablo Jr.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API