Legal Opinion

Matter of Weir

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1996No. 18S00-9409-DI-920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The respondent, Richard A. Weir, has been charged with professional misconduct stemming from three acts involving indecent behavior. Specifically, the respondent has been charged under three counts with violating Ind.Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(d) 1 and under one count with violating Prof. Cond.R. 44. 2 The Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have tendered a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline in accordance with Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11)(c). Under the terms of this agreement, the respondent is to be suspended from the…

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. In The Matter of Paul D. EdmistonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In the Matter of Calvin Delee HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API