Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Link
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 19, 2004No. Misc. Docket AG No. 97, Sept. Term, 2002Published
1Opinion of the Court
844 A.2d 1197 (2004)
380 Md. 405
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Harold S. LINK, Jr.
Misc. Docket AG No. 97, Sept. Term, 2002.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
March 19, 2004.
Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and Glenn M. Grossman, Deputy Bar Counsel for Atty. Grievance Com'n of MD, Petitioner.
Harold S. Link, Jr., Cockeysville, for Respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, and JOHN C. ELDRIDGE (retired, specially assigned), JJ.
BELL, Chief Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751,[1]…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Wilner; Concurrence · Raker.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Butts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.