In The Matter of Paul D. Edmiston
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charged the respondent, Paul D. Edmiston, with violating the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law for committing a criminal act, public indecency, which reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects. Our jurisdiction in this case is derived from the respondent’s admission to the bar of this state on October 10, 1973. The Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have entered into a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, which…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of WeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1996