Legal Opinion
City of Pittsburgh v. West Penn Power Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 6, 1998No. Civil Action 97-1772PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LANCASTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 6th day of Jan., 1998, after the plaintiff, City of Pittsburgh, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after motions to dismiss were submitted by both defendants, Allegheny Power and Duquesne Light Company, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff and the response to those objections filed by defendants from which it appears that a hearing…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Pittsburgh v. West Penn Power Comp., D/B/A Allegheny Power Allegheny Power System, Incorporated Duquesne Light Company Dqe, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- City of Pittsburgh v. West Penn Power CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- City of Pittsburgh v. West Penn Power Comp., D/B/A Allegheny Power Allegheny Power System, Incorporated Duquesne Light Company Dqe, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Federal Trade Commission v. Equitable Resources, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007