Legal Opinion

Yow v. Pittman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1954No. 313PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendants applied for an order of court permitting them to take, and requiring Dr. Brenizer to submit to the taking of, a deposition “pertaining to his examination, medical history secured by him, his diagnosis and treatment of the plaintiff, . . .” Such a deposition would require the physician to disclose not only his clinical findings, diagnosis and treatment, but “the history secured by him” from the plaintiff — information of a very confidential nature.

The defendants do not proceed under the deposition statute, G.S. 8-71, broad as its provisions are: “Any party in a civil action or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BoddieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Sawyer v. . WeskettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. In Re Albemarle Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API