Yow v. Pittman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The defendants applied for an order of court permitting them to take, and requiring Dr. Brenizer to submit to the taking of, a deposition “pertaining to his examination, medical history secured by him, his diagnosis and treatment of the plaintiff, . . .” Such a deposition would require the physician to disclose not only his clinical findings, diagnosis and treatment, but “the history secured by him” from the plaintiff — information of a very confidential nature.
The defendants do not proceed under the deposition statute, G.S. 8-71, broad as its provisions are: “Any party in a civil action or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BoddieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Sawyer v. . WeskettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- In Re Albemarle Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.