In Re Albemarle Mental Health Center
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Judge.
The sole question on appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that it was “without jurisdiction to proceed and to determine the merits, rights and duties of the parties.”
The State argues, and we agree, that this cause is in the nature of a special proceeding. G.S. 1-2 provides that “An action is an ordinary proceeding in a court of justice, by which a party prosecutes another party for the enforcement or protection of a right, the redress or prevention of a wrong, or the punishment or prevention of a public offense.” G.S. 1-3 provides that “Every other remedy is a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- United States v. Frank S. Cannone, United States of America v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Blackburn JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Jess David RichterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re the Investigation of the Death of MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- In Re the Summons Issued to Ernst & Young, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- In Re the Investigation Into the Injury of BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Adams v. LovetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.