Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. McCaskill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1964No. 234PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Referring to the deposition statute, G.S. 8-71, this Court in Yow v. Pittman, 241 N.C. 69, 84 S.E. 2d 297, in opinion by Higgins, J., said: “This statute does not contemplate the taking of deposition of a person disqualified to give evidence in the case.”

As in Yow, the deposition statute must be considered in connection with G.S. 8-53, which provides: “Communications between physician and patient. — No person, duly authorized to practice physic or surgery, shall be required to disclose any information which he may have acquired in attending a patient in a professional character, and which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Smith v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API