Lockwood v. McCaskill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Referring to the deposition statute, G.S. 8-71, this Court in Yow v. Pittman, 241 N.C. 69, 84 S.E. 2d 297, in opinion by Higgins, J., said: “This statute does not contemplate the taking of deposition of a person disqualified to give evidence in the case.”
As in Yow, the deposition statute must be considered in connection with G.S. 8-53, which provides: “Communications between physician and patient. — No person, duly authorized to practice physic or surgery, shall be required to disclose any information which he may have acquired in attending a patient in a professional character, and which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Smith v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.