Legal Opinion

Coro Brokerage, Inc. v. Rickard

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 10, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Proctor, J.

The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court from a judgment which the Hudson County District Court had entered in favor of the defendants. We granted certification under R. R. 1:10-1 (a).

The plaintiff, a New York corporation, is an insurance broker and licensed to do business in New Jersey. The defendants, James Rickard and Madlyn Rickard, husband and wife, owned and operated a fleet of nine taxicabs in Jersey City. On April 11, 1957, because of adverse accident experiences, their policy of liability insurance was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Arndt v. Miller, Daybill & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co. v. Rothenberg & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Romberg v. KoutherAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  5. Tanenbaum v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re AdamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  2. Owens v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Silverstein v. LastNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Christensen v. New Jersey, Division of Motor Vehicles (In Re Christensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  5. In Re Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API