Tanenbaum v. Rosenthal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Harry Rosenthal and another, composing the firm of H. Rosenthal & Co., from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of June, 1899, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendants’ answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Rumsey, J.:
This action was brought to recover the-sum of $176.18 for insurance claimed to have been procured by the plaintiff for the defendT ants pursuant to a contract made, between the firm of I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co. and the defendants. The contract was annexed to, and made a part of, the complaint. The answer contained four “ separate and distinct defenses,” to each of which a demurrer was interposed upon, the ground that it was not sufficient in law to constitute a defense, and the whole, answer was also demurred to on the same ground.
The proposition which lies at the basis of the answer…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Coro Brokerage, Inc. v. RickardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co. v. Rothenberg & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Tanenbaum v. GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Tanenbaum v. GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902