Legal Opinion
Peroff v. Liddy, Sullivan, Galway, Begler & Peroff, P.C.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 1994No. 93 Civ. 6823 (PKL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This is an action arising out of an attorney’s withdrawal from a law firm. Plaintiff seeks partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 declaring a provision of a shareholders agreement concerning his right to compensation unenforceable as contrary to public policy. 1 Plaintiff also seeks certain injunctive relief concerning the forwarding of mail and transferring of client files.
I. STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
“Summary judgment may be granted if, upon reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant, the court determines…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Thomas Taggart v. Time IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Capozzi v. Latsha & Capozzi, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pettingell v. Morrison, Mahoney & MillerMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996
- Sean Southard, as Plan Administrator of the Amende v. BARRETTUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Sean Southard, as Plan Administrator of the Amende v. BARRETTUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Wawa, Inc. v. MasterCard International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023