Legal Opinion

G-C-L

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3470PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

23 I&N Dec. 359

(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3470 In re G-C-L-, Respondent Decided April 10, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The Board of Immigration Appeals withdraws from its policy of granting untimely motions to reopen by applicants claiming eligibility for asylum based solely on coercive population control policies, effective 90 days from the date of this decision. Matter of X-G-W-, Interim Decision 3352 (BIA 1998), superseded. FOR RESPONDENT: Stephen P. Gleit, Esquire, New York, New York BEFORE: Board En Banc:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. C-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  2. CHANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  3. A-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
  4. X-P-TBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  5. GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1993

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Tigran Ekimian Rouzan Nagapetian Avetis Hekimian v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Li Yong Zheng v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Xu Ming Li Xin Kui Yu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Jian Huan Guan v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Zeferino Mendez-Gutierrez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API