Legal Opinion
X-P-T
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1996No. ID 3299PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3299 In re X-P-T-, Applicant Decided December 18, 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) An alien who has been forced to abort a pregnancy or to under go involuntary sterilization, or who has been persecuted for resistance to a coercive population control program, has suf- fered past persecution on account of political opinion and qualifies as a refugee within the amended definition of that term under section 101(a)(42) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (to be codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)). Matter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- HBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
- Antonio Urbina-Mauricio v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- CHANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
3Cited by32 opinions
- C-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- Zhu v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Xuan Wang v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- T-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Cai Luan Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.