Legal Opinion
Pande Cameron & Co. of Seattle, Inc. v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 20, 2009No. Case 07-cv-1312-JPDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES P. DONOHUE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY CONCLUSION
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 38, 45, 50. After careful consideration of the motions, the oppositions and the reply briefs, the supporting materials, the governing law, oral argument of counsel, and the balance of the record, Defendant Sound Transit’s motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 38, is GRANTED, Defendant City of Seattle’s motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 45, is…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sommer v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- 3Pak LLC v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Diamond a Ranch, Western Division, L.L.C. v. WolfDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Hunters Capital LLC v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023