Klammer v. Department of Transportation
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtT. Gillespie, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff was forced to retire at age 70 as required by the State Employees’ Retirement Act, MCL 38.19(3); MSA 3.981(19)(3). He subsequently filed suit claiming that his forced retirement violated the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq. The trial court ruled that his claim was barred by the mandatory retirement provision cited above. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff-appellant, George F. Klammer, had been employed by the Michigan Department of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Department of Natural Resources v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Argo Oil Corporation v. AtwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. TurmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- By Lo Oil Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Zoppi v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- House of Representatives v. GovernorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Zanni v. Medaphis Physician Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999