Zoppi v. Chrysler Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition of his age discrimination claim. We affirm.
Plaintiff’s claim arose from defendant’s denial of his application for early retirement under its "selective special early retirement program” that was offered for a limited time. In order to qualify for the program, an employee was required (1) to have been on the active payroll on or after August 1, 1987; (2) to be age fifty-five or older; (3) to be a participant in the pension plan; (4) to be selected by management to participate; and (5)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMannSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Barnell v. Taubman Co, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Featherly v. Teledyne Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ewers v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zanni v. Medaphis Physician Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Zanni v. Medaphis Physician Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999