Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Interior Realty & Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 7, 1921No. 9750PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of Alamosa County, Hon. J. C. Wiley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Suit by The Interior Realty and Investment Company against Charles E. Gibson to quiet title to certain real property under section 274 of the Code. Judgment v/as for the company. Gibson assigns error, and brings the cause here for review.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff is the owner and in possession of the land involved. It set out the adverse claim of defendant and prayed that the title be quieted. The answer admits that defendant claims an interest, and alleges it to be ownership in fee. No replication was filed, neither did defendant ask affirmative relief.

Plaintiff claims under a tax…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morris & Thombs v. St. Louis National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Mitchell v. TitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Lambert v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Phillippi v. LeetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welsh v. LevySupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Bennett v. RohanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API