Legal Opinion · Dissent

James E. Swann, and Cross-Appellants v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, and Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1970No. 14517, 14518Published

1DissentAlbert V. Bryan, Circuit Judge

The Court commands the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education to provide busing of pupils to its public schools for “achieving integration”. (Accent added.) “[Achieving integration” is the phraseology used, but actually, achieving racial balance is the objective. Busing to prevent racial imbalance is not as yet a Constitutional obligation. Therefore, no matter the prior or present utilization of busing for this or other reasons, and regardless of cost considerations or duplication of the bus routes, I think the injunction cannot stand.

Without Constitutional origin, no power exists in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Tina Deal, a Minor by Frank L. Deal, Her Father and Next Friend v. The Cincinnati Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Northcross v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API