James E. Swann, and Cross-Appellants v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, and Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentAlbert V. Bryan, Circuit Judge
The Court commands the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education to provide busing of pupils to its public schools for “achieving integration”. (Accent added.) “[Achieving integration” is the phraseology used, but actually, achieving racial balance is the objective. Busing to prevent racial imbalance is not as yet a Constitutional obligation. Therefore, no matter the prior or present utilization of busing for this or other reasons, and regardless of cost considerations or duplication of the bus routes, I think the injunction cannot stand.
Without Constitutional origin, no power exists in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Tina Deal, a Minor by Frank L. Deal, Her Father and Next Friend v. The Cincinnati Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Northcross v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1970