Legal Opinion

Tina Deal, a Minor by Frank L. Deal, Her Father and Next Friend v. The Cincinnati Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1969No. 19210PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, Circuit Judge.

In the first appeal which involved a claim of alleged de facto rather than de jure segregation, we affirmed the judgment of the District Court on the issue of racial imbalance, holding that the Board of Education was not required by the Constitution to bus Negro or white children out of their neighborhoods, or to transfer classes, for the sole purpose of alleviating racial imbalance which was not caused by any act of discrimination on the part of the Board but resulted from the racial concentrations in the neighborhoods in which the schools were located, and further, that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Monroe v. Board of Commissioners of JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Raney v. Board of Education of Gould School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Lee v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1970
  2. Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Mona Bronson v. Board of Education of the City School District of Cincinnati, Its Members, Etal.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Davis v. School District of the City of Pontiac, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970
  5. James E. Swann, and Cross-Appellants v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API