Legal Opinion
Application of Ahmed Panagrossi and Ray L. Hauser
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 6, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6542PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge
RICH, Judge.
Appellants filed an application to reissue their Patent No. 2,705,691 on March 22, 1957, Ser. No. 647,931. The patent is not included in the record but it is understood that the application on appeal contains a specification identical with that of the patent. Numerous claims have been allowed, additional to the claims of the patent, and this appeal is from the refusal to allow three claims which read as follows:
“5. A fluorine-substituted polyethylene body having fused to one of its surfaces a priming composition containing rubber.
“6. A fluorine-substituted polyethylene body having…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re HerthelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
3Cited by9 opinions
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Winifred June Adams, David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re SalemCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Application of Erwin F. SchoenewaldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Henry P. Wohnsiedler and Clayton J. AmmondsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.