Legal Opinion

Application of Henry P. Wohnsiedler and Clayton J. Ammondson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 25, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of eleven claims 1 of appellants 2 applicationz entitled “Resinous Composition and Process of Preparation.” Fifteen claims have been allowed.

The invention relates to the preparation of polymerizable oxirane triazine compounds, and to polymerized products thereof. According to appellants’ specification, the polymerizable reaction product, which contains an oxirane ring and a triazine ring, is obtained by reacting, in the presence of a halogen acceptor, a monohalohydrin of a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ivar Jepson v. Robert E. Coleman, Jr., and Calvin D. MacCrackenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In re HerthelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. Application of Ahmed Panagrossi and Ray L. HauserCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of Erwin F. SchoenewaldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Erwin F. SchoenewaldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API