Legal Opinion

Association of Irritated Residents v. C & R Vanderham Dairy

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 16, 2006No. F 05-4593 AWI SMSPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’S MOTION TO DISMISS

ISHII, District Judge.

This is a Clean Air Act (“CAA”) case brought by Plaintiff Association of Irritated Residents (“AIR”) against Defendants C & R Vanderham Dairy, and Rick and Corrie Vanderham (collectively ‘Vander-ham”). AIR alleges that Vanderham violated California’s State Implementation Plan by constructing a stationary source that may emit pollutants without obtaining an Authority to Construct (“ATC”) permit from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (“the District”) and without the attendant pollution limitations required…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Association of Irritated Residents v. Fred Schakel DairyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  2. Forcellati v. Hyland's, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Holley v. Gilead Scis., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API