Legal Opinion

Nick-George Ltd. Partnership v. Ames-Ennis, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1977No. [No. 122, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.

This case raises the question of the limitations imposed upon judicial review of an arbitrator’s award under the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act (the Act), now Maryland Code (1974), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article § 3-223 and § 3-224. The sections respectively set out conditions upon which an arbitrator’s award may be corrected or modified and the grounds upon which it may be vacated. Because the issues are primarily procedural, we need summarize only the relevant facts.

On 17 May 1971, Nick-George Limited Partnership (Nick-George) entered into a contract with Ames-Ennis, Inc.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frederick Contractors, Inc. v. Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. O-S Corp. v. Samuel A. Kroll, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Security Construction Co. v. MaiettaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Washington Homes, Inc. v. Interstate Land Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Joseph H. Munson Co. v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. United Technology & Resources, Inc. v. Dar Al IslamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. BD. OF ED. OF CHARLES CTY. v. Ed. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API