Legal Opinion
State v. Lawrence
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1931No. 23409. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
— The defendant was tried and convicted in a justice court of Kittitas county upon the following complaint filed by the county water master:
“Benj. Vaughn, being first duly sworn, on his oath says that Phil Lawrence on or about the 29th day of April, 1931, in Kittitas county, state of Washington, then and there being, did then and there, unlawfully and willfully interfere with a dam and a headgate for the diversion of water for irrigation. Thereby committing a misdemeanor.”
The defendant appealed to the superior court, and, from a conviction therein upon the same complaint, appeals to this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. RandallWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- McLean v. Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Hamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- Stethem v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stempel v. Department of Water ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Roseburg v. MoharWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Humboldt Lovelock Irrigation Light & Power Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1938
- State v. ComerWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.