Legal Opinion
American Power Pull Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 16, 2015No. Slip Op. 15-128; Court 14-00088PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARNETT, Judge:
Defendant, the United States, moves, pursuant to USCIT Rules 12(b)(1) and 56, to dismiss allegations- of-subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i) in the Complaint of Plaintiff, American Power Pull Corporation, and for summary judgment on all remaining claims brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §. 1581(a). Def.’s. Mot. to Dismiss for Lack of 28 U.S.C.- § 1581(i) Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J.; & Def.’s Mot. to Stay Further Disc, (collectively “MSJ”), ECF No. 26. 1 Plaintiff concedes that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- International Trading Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quiedan Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Acquisition 362, LLC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
- Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
- Home Prods. Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.