Castenson v. City of Harcourt
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION. 05 tO 00
A. Procedural Background. O) tO oo
B. Factual Background. O 00
II. LEGAL ANALYSIS. ^ CO
A. Standards For Summarg
Judgment. ^ fc-00
B. The Parties’ Contentions ... LQ fc-oo
C. The False Certification Claim. 00 cn
1. Nature of the claim. 00 Cn
2. Authority for the claim. 00
3. Is the claim amenable to summary judgment? . 00 c-00
D. The FONSI Notice Claim... T — 1 oo 00
1. The notice requirement . 04 00 00
2. Were the Castensons entitled to personal notice…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Hartnagel v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2006
- Miller Manufacturing Company v. Tractor Supply CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026