Legal Opinion

Castenson v. City of Harcourt

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided March 8, 2000No. C 99-3031-MWBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION. 05 tO 00

A. Procedural Background. O) tO oo

B. Factual Background. O 00

II. LEGAL ANALYSIS. ^ CO

A. Standards For Summarg

Judgment. ^ fc-00

B. The Parties’ Contentions ... LQ fc-oo

C. The False Certification Claim. 00 cn

1. Nature of the claim. 00 Cn

2. Authority for the claim. 00

3. Is the claim amenable to summary judgment? . 00 c-00

D. The FONSI Notice Claim... T — 1 oo 00

1. The notice requirement . 04 00 00

2. Were the Castensons entitled to personal notice…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Hartnagel v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2006
  2. Miller Manufacturing Company v. Tractor Supply CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API